Connecticut Attorneys Author Article on CT Supreme Court UM/UIM Exclusions Case

Connecticut attorneys Kate Adams and Liz O’Donnell have co-authored an article, “Connecticut Supreme Court Decision Invalidates UM/UIM Exclusions for Self-Insured Vehicles” which explores the Court’s recent Tannone, et al. v. Amica Mutual Ins. Co., 329 Conn. 665 (2018) decision.

The decision invalidates a long-standing regulation that permitted automobile insurers to exclude from underinsured/uninsured motorist coverage rental vehicles owned by self-insured entities. This may require automobile insurers to amend their Connecticut UM/UIM coverage forms.

To read the attorneys’ full article on the potential impacts of the Tannone decision, please click here.

Disclaimer: Contents of this article or others on LitchfieldCavo.com may be considered attorney advertising under the rules of certain jurisdictions. The material contained on Litchfield Cavo LLP’s website is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute individualized legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.